Hello There, Guest!

16-12-2009, 11:10 PM | Post: #61
amuse 
(16-12-2009 06:11 PM)SufferBaron Wrote:  LOL I think Mortars and Artillery are good idea :O

I like this way more.

How about a soldier ability to call in artillery? Like a thrown flare for example that has a duration and amount of shells that scale according to spec. To counter it, you could have it eaten by IEG from a gunner. I think the damage aspect could be abused however, and it might bet better to have a damage spec less than but close to nade spam with a launch effect of a near direct hit/ direct hit of rpg.

edit: on a map wide note: what about the capturing of automatic firing artillery complexes. Like, for example in SSD, there could be a center siege position with outlying artillery camps that could be captured to automatically randomly shell a set radius at a set location.
(This post was last modified: 16-12-2009 11:13 PM by amuse.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 02:27 PM | Post: #62
SufferBaron 
Yea... but I still like HELI's Big Grin

[Image: fPi38gA.png]
[Image: 20fdzqw.jpg][Image: 30cr5u9.jpg] [Image: 2zqz9ua.jpg] [Image: 2vdnog3.jpg][Image: msv3p.jpg][Image: 211kwvm.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 02:56 PM | Post: #63
OneTyme 
Heli's would be sweet, but they would have to add another ground vehicle to both sides.

And I like the idea of Mortars, just not artillery. Artillery was the main problem in the other Battlefield games.

[Image: onetymesig1.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 03:11 PM | Post: #64
Supergrovar 
(12-12-2009 01:36 PM)StormWingsK Wrote:  nice, but to much passengers. Change it for 1 turret and 3 passenger ( without pilot )

It would be nice to have a few helicopters in a new to come map which exists of a few islands. So that way, the choppers would be a must in that map. But they should be used for tranportation only. There should not be a MG on the heli. This will give to big of an advantage over planes and tanks, although the passengers should be able to shoot out of the plain with their own weapons. Big Grin
I think fighter helicopters don't belong on this battlefield. They belong with fighter-jets and tanks with heatseaking missles and such.
(This post was last modified: 18-12-2009 04:12 PM by Supergrovar.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 03:42 PM | Post: #65
[N2D]Red
(12-12-2009 01:37 PM)B.Randt-Stiffter Wrote:  Nice text, but in the WWII there wasn't any helicopters Smile

Were there health tonics, different clothing, and "uber" weapons? Don't think so. Smile
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 04:52 PM | Post: #66
SufferBaron 
You guys aren't even reading the post... just skimming it.

[Image: fPi38gA.png]
[Image: 20fdzqw.jpg][Image: 30cr5u9.jpg] [Image: 2zqz9ua.jpg] [Image: 2vdnog3.jpg][Image: msv3p.jpg][Image: 211kwvm.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 07:43 PM | Post: #67
Kubikuroh 
I see helicopters shot down faster than a plane...

[Image: 2u72kpe.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 07:45 PM | Post: #68
Futski 
The Helicopter existed, but it was on the prototype level. The Flettner Fl 282 was actually used as reconnaissance vehicle, but still it wasn' built in hundreds. The allies also had helicopter projects, because the first airmail, delivered by helicopters was in 1947, and research and production of something like that, takes atleast 10 years.

I think it could be fun to try. And don't worry, a helicopter is a sitting duck for planes, have you ever played BF2?

/signed
(This post was last modified: 18-12-2009 08:16 PM by Futski.)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 07:55 PM | Post: #69
Uuniperuna 
How about.. No.

[Image: ristsmile-t.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 09:17 PM | Post: #70
Supergrovar 
(18-12-2009 07:43 PM)Kubikuroh Wrote:  I see helicopters shot down faster than a plane...

Would make the RPG mission a lot easier. Kill one pilot and three passengers in one blow ... Big GrinTongue
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
18-12-2009, 10:06 PM | Post: #71
DarkBoy12131 
I agree completely. its a game adding a helicopter wouldn't hurt to add a heli
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2009, 05:44 PM | Post: #72
SufferBaron 
Tx for your opinions. Big Grin

[Image: fPi38gA.png]
[Image: 20fdzqw.jpg][Image: 30cr5u9.jpg] [Image: 2zqz9ua.jpg] [Image: 2vdnog3.jpg][Image: msv3p.jpg][Image: 211kwvm.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2009, 06:24 PM | Post: #73
kriegtrooper95 
glad to see this idea is still alive i'm all for it

[Image: 4rbwf24r.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2009, 07:38 PM | Post: #74
SufferBaron 
GUYS! stop letting this idea fall to page 4 Sad

[Image: fPi38gA.png]
[Image: 20fdzqw.jpg][Image: 30cr5u9.jpg] [Image: 2zqz9ua.jpg] [Image: 2vdnog3.jpg][Image: msv3p.jpg][Image: 211kwvm.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2009, 07:43 PM | Post: #75
Timeluster 
its a rubbish idea thats why.

[Image: 33eilgi.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
21-12-2009, 01:19 PM | Post: #76
SufferBaron 
Well, you are entitled to your opinion.

[Image: fPi38gA.png]
[Image: 20fdzqw.jpg][Image: 30cr5u9.jpg] [Image: 2zqz9ua.jpg] [Image: 2vdnog3.jpg][Image: msv3p.jpg][Image: 211kwvm.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
21-12-2009, 01:21 PM | Post: #77
Eburoon 
(20-12-2009 07:38 PM)SufferBaron Wrote:  GUYS! stop letting this idea fall to page 4 Sad

I disagree.

[Image: 5]
| Soldier Guide | Discovery of /me | Creative Spelling Ideas |
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
21-12-2009, 01:54 PM | Post: #78
firefoxguy 
Nice idea I'm a fan of helicopters,Cool
but I asked ShadeShooter for a AH-64 apacheBig Grin
and
lasers for snipers +Big Grin
missiles on planes +Shy
boats for helicopters to land on!! Wink.

I love helicopters so I sign / signed

[Image: 5]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
21-12-2009, 04:41 PM | Post: #79
Karishihiro. 
(12-12-2009 01:47 PM)SufferBaron Wrote:  Lol, I didn't expect to get replies within the fist ten minutes!!!,
First off: Helicopters were first seen on the battlefield in 1942. So tere we go for that one. Second of all... shotguns weren't in large scale production in WWII... so can't really put this down on that factor.
Second of all: It's a game... you can't tell me this wouldn't be fun. and... It isn't op... its slow... and it would be incredibly hard to hit a plane with a single rocket.. so if a plane attacked the helicopter from the top... it would be completely helpless and explode very fast. even if planes attacked it from the side where turrets were... the planes would easily outgun the turrets.

An Apache is the only helicopter capable of fighting off several planes, but this is not a gore/death/realistic military game, hence the cartoon graphics. If the planes could so easily kill that helicopter then it would not be balanced, for example. -Helicopter is flying- -Plane comes- -Boom- -3 to 4 deaths- -Nothing a helicopter could do-

[Image: 1]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
21-12-2009, 05:05 PM | Post: #80
coolmancam 
/signed but only have: 1 driver, 1 copilot, 2 turrets and 1 person in the back. and only the turret people can jump out, the rest have to land. that would make it fairer so u could not jump on top of spots with 5 people only 2.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply




Forum Jump:



X
Add this person to your friends list
Remove this person from your friends list
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend