[guide] Trusty's lil' weapon's guide!

[7JonasKiller7]

Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon.
If you want to make a succesful guide consider this:

- What information does the reader really need.


Also a tip: Often players want to know which weapon they should use, weapon x or weapon y. So instead of giving tonnes of details you should add a little comparison with its alternatives and then give a conclusion which weapon is appropriate in which sitatuation.


Example:

Sr Shotgun - The shortrange shotgun has large damage output on very shortrange however its limited on greater ranges etc...

Sr SMG - Can be combined with burning bullets. Can be used on medium, short and medium-long range, most common soldier weapon...

Comparison: The sr smg has the capability to be used with burning bullets etc...

Good luck, looks promising!

[LightItUp!]

(01-08-2012 01:08 PM)7JonasKiller7 Wrote:  Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon.
If you want to make a succesful guide consider this:

- What information does the reader really need.


Also a tip: Often players want to know which weapon they should use, weapon x or weapon y. So instead of giving tonnes of details you should add a little comparison with its alternatives and then give a conclusion which weapon is appropriate in which sitatuation.


Example:

Sr Shotgun - The shortrange shotgun has large damage output on very shortrange however its limited on greater ranges etc...

Sr SMG - Can be combined with burning bullets. Can be used on medium, short and medium-long range, most common soldier weapon...

Comparison: The sr smg has the capability to be used with burning bullets etc...

Good luck, looks promising!

Totally disagree. I like how he does it, it gives you all the information you could possibly need and if you dont need it, dont read it! I was curious how much crit it has and are glad to know it now.

[Magister_Ludi]

(01-08-2012 01:08 PM)7JonasKiller7 Wrote:  Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon.
If you want to make a succesful guide consider this:

- What information does the reader really need.

What are you on? It's supposed to be an in depth guide. In fact, I would like to see more guides like this about other weapons.

"What information does the reader really need"
Did you learn this in English class?

[7JonasKiller7]

(01-08-2012 11:28 PM)Magister_Ludi Wrote:  

(01-08-2012 01:08 PM)7JonasKiller7 Wrote:  Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon.
If you want to make a succesful guide consider this:

- What information does the reader really need.

What are you on? It's supposed to be an in depth guide. In fact, I would like to see more guides like this about other weapons.

"What information does the reader really need"
Did you learn this in English class?

I'm german. can you speak this good german. I doubt it. Can you speak any foreign language as fluently as i speak english? I doubt it. Have you got good arguments? Nope.

Okay, you would like to see more of these in-depth guides, well thats nice, thats your opinion, how does that give you the right to "hate" on my opinion. More over i think a comparison with other weapons would be very useful, whats the point in telling us how good a weapon is if we don't know how it compares to other weapons?


Also, i misinterpreted the basic idea of this guide, i thought that more weapons would be added to it and that interlinking them would add a nice aspect.
If you read the title of this guide again you will see it says "weapon's". Moreover he reserved a lot of posts. (well twice as many as he used.)

Also there is already a "guide" where a lot of weapon stats are listed.

http://www.battlefieldheroes.com/en/foru...?tid=67487

Then there is the bfh wiki as well...

http://battlefieldheroes.wikia.com/wiki/...ry:Weapons


However if its not supposed to be a weapon's guide, but a guide for one weapon its not a problem.

[Magister_Ludi]

Actually, I speak Mandarin. Anyways, the English joke was because English teachers always tell their students to consider what the reader needs.

As far as arguments go, I was commenting on your opinion; this is allowed I believe. Furthermore, the statement I made about your "opinion" was concerned with the fact that you said, "Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon." I disagree. Basically, I enjoy reading in depth guides. This never was an argument.

The comparison idea is fine. I never commented on this. No need to restate it. Although, he does give advice for other weapon choice.

[7JonasKiller7]

(03-08-2012 02:30 AM)Magister_Ludi Wrote:  Actually, I speak Mandarin. Anyways, the English joke was because English teachers always tell their students to consider what the reader needs.

As far as arguments go, I was commenting on your opinion; this is allowed I believe. Furthermore, the statement I made about your "opinion" was concerned with the fact that you said, "Dude, its crazy to go into that much detail for one weapon." I disagree. Basically, I enjoy reading in depth guides. This never was an argument.

The comparison idea is fine. I never commented on this. No need to restate it. Although, he does give advice for other weapon choice.

I agree that in-depth guides are very useful and interesting, however, as stated before, i made the assumption that he was going to add a lot more weapons. Making a guide for more weapons whilst maintaining the standard he presented in his first post would be near impossible, as he would get bored and then quality would constantly drop.

Whatever, its a very informative guide and it helps those that are looking for more details on M16-203 Battle-Rifle.

[SuperU-1]

wow guys, thx for all the feedback!