Who Are These Guys?

[Fearless-Death]

(15-05-2012 01:46 AM)Risky_Dangerman Wrote:  

(15-05-2012 12:34 AM)Fearless-Death Wrote:  

(14-05-2012 10:16 PM)Risky_Dangerman Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 10:15 AM)APELINCOLN Wrote:  troii
troll
troil
troli

=

Troll

Many people do this actually

Got beaten up by a green for having a sig that exceeds 250x900 limit?

I don't get why, your sig is already higher than mine so I'm not sure why I need to change it.

Your sig was a little too big. You changed it, that's why I said the sentence is past tense.

I know it's hard for a royal, but apply some [common] sense please

[Risky_Dangerman]

I meant my old one numbskull, I have seen sigs higher then my old one before.

[Fearless-Death]

(15-05-2012 02:03 AM)Risky_Dangerman Wrote:  I meant my old one numbskull, I have seen sigs higher then my old one before.

Not allowed. No exceptions. Hush your royal mouth

[Risky_Dangerman]

Like I care?

[Salvenius.]

(15-05-2012 02:03 AM)Risky_Dangerman Wrote:  I meant my old one numbskull, I have seen sigs higher then my old one before.

Then report them, just like I reported yours...it's that simple. Anything bigger than 250 pixels in height = a lot of scrolling for people. Especially when someone only writes one sentence and has a 350 pixel high picture. That picture could be the Mona Lisa of all signatures but not everyone comes here to stare at signatures, they come here to read posts and discuss/reply to those posts.

So if anyone has a signature over 250 pixels high and 900 in width then report it and don't complain when your own gets hit.

[TroII69]

Looks like naming and shaming is now allowed? No Mod has closed this thread yet.

[TrolI69]

(20-05-2012 06:17 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Looks like naming and shaming is now allowed? No Mod has closed this thread yet.

[TroIl69]

(20-05-2012 06:18 PM)TrolI69 Wrote:  

(20-05-2012 06:17 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Looks like naming and shaming is now allowed? No Mod has closed this thread yet.

[Salvenius.]

(20-05-2012 06:17 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Looks like naming and shaming is now allowed? No Mod has closed this thread yet.

This isn't naming and shaming ¬_¬

Though this should be closed for pointing out something really pointless and giving you guys what you want, which is attention

[TroII69]

(21-05-2012 05:47 PM)Salvenius. Wrote:  

(20-05-2012 06:17 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Looks like naming and shaming is now allowed? No Mod has closed this thread yet.

This isn't naming and shaming ¬_¬

Though this should be closed for pointing out something really pointless and giving you guys what you want, which is attention

Orly?

Reporting problematic players:
Don't give possible hackers, exploiters, stat-padders or otherwise problematic players attention on the forums. This includes, but is not limited to, creating topics about them, mocking them, generally discussing them and/or posting their user names.

http://www.battlefieldheroes.com/en/foru...tid=142585

[Salvenius.]

So you define yourself as a problematic player? Interesting...

[SirLazarus]

(21-05-2012 07:22 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Self-incrimination.

Uhhh, so you admit to causing problems?

[Unklz]

(14-05-2012 10:06 PM)R3TARDS0LD1ER Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 06:21 AM)undercoverLORD Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 06:03 AM)TroIl69 Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 06:02 AM)TrolI69 Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 06:02 AM)TroII69 Wrote:  Hi

Professional trolls. damn, now they r coming in numbers.

Fail trolls if you ask me...

*looks at your name* I wouldnt ask you.

[TroII69]

(21-05-2012 07:42 PM)Salvenius. Wrote:  So you define yourself as a problematic player? Interesting...

Problematic: posing a problem, difficult to solve.
Thread: Can't figure out our names. Also know as, something they can't solve.

[APELINCOLN]

Troll69, Troll69 and Troll69.
Stop spamming/bumping this thread please.

[TrolI69]

(21-05-2012 07:49 PM)SirLazarus Wrote:  

(21-05-2012 07:22 PM)TroII69 Wrote:  Self-incrimination.

Uhhh, so you admit to causing problems?

That was a quote from the rules to prove to Salvenius this thread is Naming & Shaming. If "Problematic Players" weren't in bold everyone would say 'Well then they must be HAX, STAT PADDERZ & EXPLOITERZ' which are all untrue.

I'd like to get back to the point of Naming & Shaming if possible, because this thread clearly is.

(13-05-2012 09:13 AM)2DayULive Wrote:  A bunch of chumps.

(14-05-2012 10:06 PM)R3TARDS0LD1ER Wrote:  

(13-05-2012 06:21 AM)undercoverLORD Wrote:  Professional trolls. damn, now they r coming in numbers.

Fail trolls if you ask me...

[Insecticon2]

You guys surely are genius.

[TrolI69]

(21-05-2012 09:10 PM)APELINCOLN Wrote:  Troll69, Troll69 and Troll69.
Stop spamming/bumping this thread please.

Not spamming. Adding to the discussion is completely different. The only people spamming were the people discussing signature rules for a page and a half as it was unrelated.

Quote:Don't Spam
Continuing the spam specific guideline: Everyone likes to be able to read forums without going blind. Please refrain from posting spam, or other "nonsense" which serves no purpose. This includes "Cool story bro", "lolumad?" images and click to grow pets and other such websites, ascii drawings and Sub/superscript, excessive or unneeded use of upper case letters, posting "First" and "Second" solely to show that you are one of the first to comment, seizure inducing animate gifs, excessively gory or violent images, this includes, but is not limited to meaningless or unproductive posts or replies (see Flaming).

Although, I guess breaking the rules in a thread that is already breaking the rules doesn't matter much, does it?

EDIT:

Quote:Trolling
Everyone wants to comment on something, and feel free to use the forums to interact with the topics that interest you. But please do not troll these forums.

Some examples that are considered trolling:
Posting replies just for the sake of posting.
Posting comments irrelevant to the topic.
Posting to simply add to the thread count.
Posting to beg for free items from others.
Posting lolcats and fail images because someone said something that was wrong.
Posting poorly formatted text to stand out or make a point.

[GDude]

(21-05-2012 05:47 PM)Salvenius. Wrote:  Though this should be closed for pointing out something really pointless and giving you guys what you want, which is attention

I'm going with this.

No difference from someone who posted a video of a cheater - the cheater wants attention so they get it by cheating which leads to players posting about them on the Forums.