Hello There, Guest!
[Suggestion] New weapon for Commando[11signs] |
|
22-04-2012, 03:46 PM |
Post: #21
rikkybooy! 
|
(21-04-2012 11:21 PM)BOSSED123 Wrote: Its will be o.p to tanks, if you can hit all 6 to stick that could do nearly 100 damage and thats just wrong lol, its harder to stick them to the tank and right now tanks are o.p so i think ur just a tank noob that doesn't want to be not o.p. anymore 
![[Image: 20313_s.png]](http://signavatar.com/20313_s.png)
|
|
|
22-04-2012, 03:46 PM |
Post: #22
gunnerb00m
|
(21-04-2012 11:21 PM)BOSSED123 Wrote: Its will be o.p to tanks, if you can hit all 6 to stick that could do nearly 100 damage and thats just wrong sticky tnt does 100 damage on tank to so that good ![[Image: sigrx.png]](http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/7687/sigrx.png)
|
|
|
|
22-04-2012, 05:19 PM |
Post: #23
KILLIBILLI4
|
|
/sign
![[Image: 5]](http://cdn.battlefieldheroes.com/de/signatures/301394097/5)
|
|
|
|
22-04-2012, 05:27 PM |
Post: #24
bulzie33 
|
|
/Sign
![[Image: 2]](http://cdn.battlefieldheroes.com/en/signatures/236364459/2)
|
|
|
|
22-04-2012, 05:55 PM |
Post: #25
Spek.
|
|
/Antisign. I already hate normal MGLs.
|
|
|
![[Image: finalentry1.jpg]](http://imageshack.us/a/img404/1069/finalentry1.jpg)
|
27-04-2012, 08:31 PM |
Post: #26
[TR]Lord
|
|
/sign
![[Image: trlordsig.png]](http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/3832/trlordsig.png)
|
|
|
|
28-04-2012, 01:18 AM |
Post: #27
SweetName 
|
|
/antisign
Why would we need an easier to use MGL? ![[Image: 2]](http://cdn.battlefieldheroes.com/signatures/194783248/2)
|
|
|
|
06-05-2012, 11:01 AM |
Post: #28
AlmostSanji
|
|
|
|
|
![[Image: signaturye.png]](http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/8839/signaturye.png)
|
31-07-2012, 09:14 PM |
Post: #29
BurningTruth
|
|
Great idea. Espescially since mando's only have 1 type of explosive weapon
/sign ![[Image: 3]](http://cdn.battlefieldheroes.com/en/signatures/769555587/3)
|
|
|
